Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation
A group of rational individuals with common interest need to select one of two outcomes. The optimal decision depends on whether certain premises or pieces of evidence are established as being true, and each member receives a noisy signal of the truth value of the relevant premises. Should the group reach a decision by voting whether each premise is true or false, or should they simply vote on ...
متن کاملwww.econstor.eu Premise-Based versus Outcome-Based Information Aggregation
A group of rational individuals with common interest need to select one of two outcomes. The optimal decision depends on whether certain premises or pieces of evidence are established as being true, and each member receives a noisy signal of the truth value of the relevant premises. Should the group reach a decision by voting whether each premise is true or false, or should they simply vote on ...
متن کاملPremise Independence in Judgment Aggregation
Judgment aggregation studies how agent opinions on logically interconnected propositions can be mapped into a collective judgment on the same propositions, and is plagued by impossibility results. In this paper we study the central notion of independence in these impossibility results. First, we argue that the distinction between the premises and conclusions play an important role in the benchm...
متن کاملAgent based information aggregation markets
8 8; 8 8$ ; &8 8 8 8 < 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 %8. '8 8 '8 < 8 8 @ 8 A8 8 '8 8 8 8 8 8 8 %8 8 8 8 ; 8 8 '8 8 8 '8 8 8 8 < 8 '8 8 8 8 8 8 8 B 8 8 < %8 C 8 8 8 ' '8 < 8 ; 8 8< 8 8 8 8 8 %8 ; 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ' 8 8 '8 '8 8 8 < 8 8 8 8 8 %8 8 8 8 < 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ; %8 C 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 < 8 <8 8 8 8 ; 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 < 8 8 %8
متن کاملComplexity of Manipulative Attacks in Judgment Aggregation for Premise-Based Quota Rules1
Endriss et al. [26] initiated the complexity-theoretic study of problems related to judgment aggregation. We extend their results for manipulating two specific judgment aggregation procedures to a whole class of such procedures, namely to uniform premise-based quota rules. In addition, we consider incomplete judgment sets and the notions of top-respecting and closeness-respecting preferences in...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Games and Economic Behavior
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0899-8256
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2014.10.011